Articles | Volume 5, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-807-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-807-2017
Research article
 | 
06 Dec 2017
Research article |  | 06 Dec 2017

Landscape evolution models using the stream power incision model show unrealistic behavior when m ∕ n equals 0.5

Jeffrey S. Kwang and Gary Parker

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Jeffrey Kwang on behalf of the Authors (21 Jul 2017)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (31 Jul 2017) by Jean Braun
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (11 Oct 2017)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by Editor) (12 Oct 2017) by Jean Braun
AR by Jeffrey Kwang on behalf of the Authors (17 Oct 2017)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (01 Nov 2017) by Jean Braun
ED: Publish as is (01 Nov 2017) by Douglas Jerolmack (Editor)
AR by Jeffrey Kwang on behalf of the Authors (02 Nov 2017)
Download
Short summary
A prevalent bedrock incision relation used in landscape evolution is the stream power incision model (SPIM), which relates incision rate to drainage area to the m power and slope to the n power. We show the most commonly used ratio, m ∕ n = 0.5, leads to scale invariance: a landscape that has a horizontal domain of 1 km × 1 km has exactly the same relief pattern as one with a 100 km × 100 km domain. This conclusion indicates that SPIM must yield unrealistic results over a wide range of conditions.