Journal cover Journal topic
Earth Surface Dynamics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.765 IF 3.765
  • IF 5-year value: 3.719 IF 5-year
    3.719
  • CiteScore value: 3.83 CiteScore
    3.83
  • SNIP value: 1.281 SNIP 1.281
  • IPP value: 3.61 IPP 3.61
  • SJR value: 1.527 SJR 1.527
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 17 Scimago H
    index 17
  • h5-index value: 18 h5-index 18
ESurf | Articles | Volume 7, issue 2
Earth Surf. Dynam., 7, 475-489, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-475-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Earth Surf. Dynam., 7, 475-489, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-475-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 29 May 2019

Research article | 29 May 2019

Determining the optimal grid resolution for topographic analysis on an airborne lidar dataset

Taylor Smith et al.
Model code and software

TopoMetricUncertainty - Calculating Topographic Metric Uncertainty and Optimal Grid Resolution Taylor Smith, Aljoscha Rheinwalt, and Bodo Bookhagen https://doi.org/10.5880/fidgeo.2019.017

Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Representing the surface of the Earth on an equally spaced grid leads to errors and uncertainties in derived slope and aspect. Using synthetic data, we develop a quality metric that can be used to compare the uncertainties in different datasets. We then apply this method to a real-world lidar dataset, and find that 1 m data have larger error bounds than lower-resolution data. The highest data resolution is not always the best choice – it is important to consider the quality of the data.
Representing the surface of the Earth on an equally spaced grid leads to errors and...
Citation